CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Robert (Bob) Granda" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Mar 1999 13:33:53 EST
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Hello All,
        Just want to make sure I have this right.  Years ago obtained a pecten
species,
Pecten nobilis (Reeve, 1852).  Along came Compendium Of Seashells and it
became Chlamys senatoria subspecies nobilis (Reeve, 1852). Then the GUIDEBOOK
TO PECTEN SHELLS was published and it became Chlamys (Mimachlamys)
crassicostata (Sowerby II, 1842).  So it is now C. (Mimachlamys) crassicostata
(Sowerby II, 1842) - right???  Also, if I were to make a label for this shell
if I were entering a shell show, is it ok to call it Mimachlamys or should I
call it Chlamys (Mimachlamys)??
 
Confused as Usual,
Bob Granda
Panama City, FL
Gulf Coast Shell Club

ATOM RSS1 RSS2