CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Sylvia S. Edwards" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 24 May 1999 10:16:40 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
I have always assumed (poor choice of words?) that a shell listed as "rare"
was one not commonly found or easily acquired.  In this context, would not
the question of how many exist in nature be moot?
 
How about everyone else?  When you look up a mollusk in a book for
identification, did you not assume that "rare" meant rarely found or
acquired?
 
Sylvia S. Edwards
Huntsville, Alabama
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2