CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Wed, 7 Jul 1999 12:22:38 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
I kind of jumped in on this conversation at the last second so if this is
covers old material im sorry. A lectotype, in my view (i could be wrong),
stends from the timer where a species was thought to have an essence and this
lectotype describes or represents a "perfect" specimen. Any variation from
this perfect specimen would just be considered a mutant of this perfect
species idea. In a species in which there is great variation I can imagine a
case where they describe what a perfect specimen should be and even help the
description with a drawing. So if this line of thought is right you do not
need an actual specimen to serve as a lectotype.
Emilio Jose

ATOM RSS1 RSS2