CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Andrew K. Rindsberg" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Aug 1999 15:32:23 -0500
Comments:
Resent-From: [log in to unmask] Originally-From: "Andrew K. Rindsberg" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Paul Monfils wrote,
"It is difficult for me to appreciate that in the overall scheme of nature,
a different process is involved in the production of new phyla or classes
than is involved in the production of new genera and families.  I thought
taxonomy viewed this as a continuum?"

Thank you, Paul, that bothered me too. It is indeed a continuum. I suspect
that someone got tenure on the basis of "discovering" the differences
between microevolution and macroevolution. Old wine in new bottles, to my
way of thinking; or at least old shells with new labels.

Andrew K. Rindsberg
Geological Survey of Alabama

ATOM RSS1 RSS2