CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Rick Harbo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 Nov 1999 16:03:49 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
James H. McLean   (Curator of Mollusks), Natural History Museum of Los
Angeles County
advises that O. pycna is definitely a good species . It is far less common
than O. baetica, it is abundant around Bodega Bay, CA, but we do have some
records from Vancouver Island.

Rick Harbo
Nanaimo, B.C. Canada

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Yoshimoto <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 9:12 PM
Subject: Olivella pycna


>Dear Comrades in Shells,
>        I just received a note from a Canadian friend requesting info on
>Olivella pycna.  He has collected a small Olivella from Vancouver Is.,
>Canada and has not seen it described in any Canadian literature.  He's
>checked Abbott's 2nd edition of American Seashells and gets the same
>description as he gets from other literature on O. baetica.  Can someone
>offer a difference between the two species or are they synonymous?
>Dan Yoshimoto
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
>Dan & Hiromi Yoshimoto
>1164 Vista Dr.
>Eureka, California
>        95503-6018
>E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2