CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
MR ART WEIL <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Mar 1998 10:17:53 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Dear jr.;-
    Among the wentletraps, we have a similar situation. In 1844, G.B.
Sowerby (Either I, II, or III or a combination of all three)
published both E. dubia and irregularis as different species. I have
always maintained that the Sowerbys MUST have seen actual differences
in the two. But people more knowledgeable than me (and bigger and
stronger) have declared the two species to be only one. One question
remaining is: so which one is it? We sem to have decided that
irregularis is THE one---for no good reason I can think of. The
reason the Sowerbys counted them as two may be that just like among
the human species, there are individual diffences. In some species
like E. lamellosum, the differences may be quite wide and lead to the
publication of (in that case) about 20 synonyms. Some species are
just more variable than others.
              Art

ATOM RSS1 RSS2