CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Monfils, Paul" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Mar 2000 14:53:22 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
We are all familiar with the concept of naming of a species after someone
for the purpose of honoring that person, whether it be the discoverer of the
species, or a colleague, or a famous contributor to the discipline, or a
member of the taxonomist's family.  Also, in a few cases, a person has
chosen to honor himself by naming a species after himself, a practice that
is technically allowable but socially frowned upon.  And now we know about
naming a species after someone in return for financial assistance.  But one
other aspect of this name game that is not talked about too often, but has
long been recognized, and occasionally utilized, is the possibility of
naming a species after someone you want to DIShonor -someone who rubs you
the wrong way, or who is on your blacklist for whatever reason.  You can
perpetually dishonor the object of your ire by attaching his family name, or
even his full name, to some species of grotesque, blood-sucking,
pestilence-carrying vermin.  There it will remain until the end of time, and
there isn't a thing he can do about it, at least not taxonomically speaking.
These days of course, some folks will sue you for dropping your hat on their
sidewalk.
Paul M.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2