CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James M Cheshire <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 00:28:58 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Dear all,
I have a debate that needs to be settled. What is the current taxonomic
status of
Conus abbotti Clench, 1946? Is it still accepted as a valid species? Ed
Petuch told me
that all the Conus described by Clench, excepting Conus floridanus
burryae, are invalid.
He said that Conus abbotti is just a synonym of Conus jacundus. I am
totally confused;
can anyone help me and tell me what is correct?

Thanks,
James

ATOM RSS1 RSS2