I agree Mr. Poppe's opinions.
I think the second one is also a arabica.

-
Jiongtao
http://www.soft.ics.keio.ac.jp/~huang/


>From: "Guido T. Poppe" <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: ID help again
>Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:29:55 +0200
>
>The first one is Cypraea arabica, the second one is more difficult and I
>have no idea. Location data is important for this one.
>
>Guido
>‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹
>Visit Conchology, with over 50000 names with author, 3800 indicated type
>species, 5000 conchological images, and fun with shells.
>
>http://www.conchology.uunethost.be/
>‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹
>
> > From: Nancy Smith <[log in to unmask]>
> > Reply-To: Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
> > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 22:00:23 -0400
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: ID help again
> >
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > Please visit this link and send me your thoughts on the species IDs of
> > these juveniles.  I appreciate it very much.  :)
> >
> > http://nansaidh.home.mindspring.com/
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Nancy
> >

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com