CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Henk and Zvia Mienis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Nov 2000 07:05:11 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (86 lines)
Daget, 1998 has recently published his revision of the African freshwater
mussels and
has reduced the number of recognized species enormously. (No copy at hand at
the moment to give you more details, because I have the book at the
university).
Regards, Henk K. Mienis.
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin S. Cummings <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: CONCH-L Digest - 14 Nov 2000 (#2000-420)


> Actually I had the same request earlier in the week and here is how I
replied:
>
> The last worldwide revision on the Order Unionoida was done by Fritz
> Haas in 1969.  In his exhaustive monograph he recognized about 835
> taxa.  However, of those 835 he recognized 353 North American species
> of which we currently recognize only about 300 (so he overshot the NA
> species by about 50).  So if you subtract 353 from his total of 835
> you get 482 in the rest of the world.  I have NO idea if he is even
> in the ballpark for the species that exist outside NA, but no one has
> worked on compiling species lists for each continent and comparing
> those numbers with Haas' estimate, so long story short, we will run
> with his number of 482.  Now we add 300 back to the 482 and we get a
> total of 782 worldwide.  As a side note I am compiling a database of
> all of the nominal species of mussels worldwide (basically databasing
> Haas) and I have well over 3100 names in the file.  Given the crazy
> SOB's in Europe describing every three differences in a shell as a
> new species (and running up the synonomies into the hundreds for each
> species recognized today) there are well over 5000 names in the
> literature.  Probably more than you wanted to know.
>
> >
> >Date:    Tue, 14 Nov 2000 19:05:15 -0500
> >From:    Alan Gettleman <[log in to unmask]>
> >Subject: Re: Freshwater
> >
> >Thomas E. Eichhorst wrote:
> >>
> >>  Quick question for the freshwater folks.  I have been told there are
about
> >  > 300 freshwater mussel species in the US.  Is this right?  How about
> >>  worldwide?
> >>
> >>  Thanks,
> >>
> >>  Tom Eichhorst in New Mexico, USA
> >
> >Tom,
> >
> >I'll answer that question if you answer how many land or marine spp. are
> >there in the United States or world.  The real musselheads of the world
> >Kevin Cummings and Tom Watters and (I praise Harry Lee by also including
> >him in this group) can provide more precise data, but here is a start:
> >The "best" checklist listing, by my count 305 spp. is Common and
> >Scientific Names of Aquatic Invertebrates from the United States and
> >Canada: Mollusks. Second Edition.  American Fisheries Society Special
> >Publication 26.  Edited by Donna D. Turgeon, et. al. 1998. I beleive the
> >cost is about $60. with CD-ROM.
> >Non-U.S. numbers are harder to come by......
> >
> >Now I am curious also.  What other lists are out there for non U.S.
> >Unionids??
> >
> >Alan Gettleman
> >Merritt Island, FL
> >PLAN TO ATTEND COA 2001 CONVENTION AT CAPE CANAVERAL, FLORIDA July
> >7-11,2001.
> >
>
>
> There are many but it is very hard to compile and compare to Haas'
> estimte.  Sounds like a good project for this winter!
>
>
> Kevin
> --
> Kevin S. Cummings
> Illinois Natural History Survey
> 607 E. Peabody Drive
> Champaign, IL 61820
> [log in to unmask]
> http://www.inhs.uiuc.edu/cbd/collections/mollusk.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2