CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Guido T. Poppe" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:33:41 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (81 lines)
I agree with Bill on the identity of this conus, but not on its labeling.
Have never heard or seen a consors turschi from the Philippines, but many
Thailandese are handled on Mactan.

Guido
‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹
Visit Conchology, with over 50000 names with author, 3800 indicated type
species, 5000 conchological images, and fun with shells.
http://www.conchology.be/
For Information on A Conchological Iconography
http://www.conchology.be/iconography/iconography.html
Register, consult, comment and search
http://www.animals4ever.com
‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹


> From: Bill Fenzan <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 22:56:24 +0100
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Identity of Cone Labelled "pilkeyi"
>
> Dear Cecil & Bill,
>
> After looking at the picture, I would say the best name for your specimen
> is: Conus consors Sowerby I, 1833, forma turschi da Motta1985.  Conus
> turschi was originally described from Thailand as a separate species.  Over
> time the shell was found elsewhere.  In the Philippines, specimens of both
> typical C. consors and the C. turschi form both turn up.
>
> In my opinion, your shell is not Conus flavus.  I have a few specimens of
> that species and all have the deep orange aperture color you mention.  I
> also have several Conus ochroleucus, forma tmetus (formerly C. pilkeyi) and
> they all have orange apertures, too.  Also, the forma tmetus has not been
> reported from the Philippines at all.  Unusally, it is reported from the
> Solomon Is.  I have specimens from there and also Fiji.  Contact me
> privately if you want more information, jpgs of specimens in my collection,
> etc.
>
> For Bill Frank:  I think the answer to your question is unfathomable.  :-)
>
> Warm regards,
>
> Bill
>
> William J. Fenzan
> 401 Sinclair St.
> Norfolk, VA  23505-4359
> USA
>
> wjf401(at)earthlink.net
>
> Phone: (757) 489-4736
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Cecil Bankston <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:09 PM
> Subject: Identity of Cone Labelled "pilkeyi"
>
>> My specimen came labeled as Conus pilkeyi.
>>
>> Shells of the Philippines pictures a shell resembling this one, labels
>> it pilkeyi, and states it has a deep orange aperture. Author's
>> corrections indicated the pictured shell actually was flavus. My
>> specimen has a pure white aperture.
>>
>> Manual of the Living Conidae states pilkeyi is a synonym of a subspecies
>> of ochroleucus: tmetus.  Its pictures of flavus most closely resemble my
>> specimen, but it also describes a yellow to orange aperture.
>>
>> Please view my specimen at the following URL:
>>
>> http://members.cox.net/cbankston/ShellImages.html
>>
>> What is the real identity of my specimen?
>> --
>> Cecil N. Bankston
>> Baton Rouge, LA USA
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2