CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Giancarlo Paganelli <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 22:13:37 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
Please, put aside for me cones with periostracum.

Ciao

Giancarlo


-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Conchologists of America List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]Per
conto di Simon Aiken
Inviato: sabato 14 dicembre 2002 21.31
A: [log in to unmask]
Oggetto: Re: filed lips and periostracum


Anyone else have an opinion on cones with periostracum?  I tried selling
cones with periostracum last year - very interesting some of them - but
I have to admit that my customers were generally indifferent...



-----Original Message-----
From: Conchologists of America List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Paul Kanner
Sent: 14 December 2002 18:24
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: filed lip

With the exception of Cypraea and some of the sand dwellers that keep
themselves free of encrustation, almost everything in my collection has
been
altered in some way from how it appeared in its natural habitat. I
rarely
see cones offered with the periostracum intact. Specimens are bleached,
scrubbed and picked at to remove marine growth. Most of us enjoy the
aesthetics of a specimen as well as the rarety. A filed lip sure looks
better than a rough broken one. As long as it is disclosed to the buyer,
who
cares?
Happy Holidays,
Paul Kanner

ATOM RSS1 RSS2