CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andrew Grebneff <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2003 21:41:33 +1300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
>Article 23.1 of the current edition of the International Code of
>Zoological Nomenclature states: "23. 1. Statement of Principle of
>Priority. The valid name of a taxon is the oldest available name
>applied to it, unless that name has been invalidated or another name
>is given precedence by any provision of the Code or by any ruling of
>the Commission. For this reason priority applies to the validity of
>synonyms, to the relative precedence of homonyms..."
>
>In a nutshell, according to the Code, junior synonyms are not valid names.

If a name is not invalid it is valid...
--
Andrew Grebneff
Dunedin, New Zealand
64 (3) 473-8863
<[log in to unmask]>
Fossil preparator
Seashell, Macintosh & VW/Toyota van nut
_________________________
I want your sinistral gastropods!
_________________________
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top posting frowned upon?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2