CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Helmut Nisters <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Jul 1999 19:01:44 PDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Dear Andy,

that's a very nice answer. I could it have done better. There is now a nice website
on www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/artaug99/hnshell2.html.
Please visit it.
Helmut from Innsbruck


Helmut Nisters
Franz-Fischer-Str. 46
A-6020 Innsbruck / Austria / Europe
phone and fax: 0043 / 512 / 57 32 14
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
url: www.netwing.at/nisters/

or

Natural History Department of the
Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum Innsbruck
malacological collection
Feldstr. 11a
A-6020 Innsbruck / Austria / Europe
phone: 0043 / 512 / 58 72 86-37

----------

As Helmut Nisters says, forms and varieties (like cotypes) belong to
yesteryear. The rule is that forms and varieties are to be treated as
subspecies where possible. One case where it is not possible is this:

Nisteroconchus helmutius, variety innsbrueckensis, form musei.

In this case, we have genus, species, variety (= subspecies), and form (=
lower in rank than subspecies, and therefore ignored by the Code). In
Latin, varietas and forma.

Anyone can still name and use forms below the subspecies level if they
like. They are simply not valid under the Code, nor are they protected by
its rules. They are ignored by it. (And as usual, the rules for plants are
different.)

Andrew K. Rindsberg
Geological Survey of Alabama

ATOM RSS1 RSS2