Emilio,
Tom and I already answered these, bubba.

Kurt

At 07:10 PM 8/13/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Kurt Auffenberg wrote:
>
>> >Kurt, as always, is right.
>>
>> I'm going to get this enlarged and framed....put it on the mirror so I can
>> read it every morning while shaving.....better yet, give it to my wife.
>>
>> This brings to mind something for you to ponder over the weekend......
>>
>> If a man is alone in the forest and says something.......is he still wrong?
>> Sorry, but this may lose something in translation for our foreign
>> correspondents....
>>
>> I know the answer. I bet most of you do too.  Have a good weekend.
>
>Hello!
>
>Hi to the Polymita commenters,
>
>Ha Ha!! Now could you please give me a straight answer. I will repeat the
>questions, if you dont mind.
>
>>I have a few more questions on the Polymita descriptions.
>
>>Polymita brocheri ("Gutierrez" Pfeiffer 1864) : this is as cited by C.
>>de la Torre in his monograph.
>
>>1) What do the "  " enclosing Gutierrez mean, that he, Gutierrez,
>>described it in Pfeiffer's work,
>>or that Pfeiffer referenced a description by Gutierrez (from a letter I
>>think)?
>
>>2) Arango amended the name to brocheroi in 1878: this is as cited by
>>Tucker Abbott, I assume C. de la Torre did not know this. Is this correct?
>>The correct name is now brocheroi and should be cited as brocheroi?
>>(Note: The species was named for General Brochero)
>
>>Your kind attention and help is much appreciated.
>
>
>Later,
>
>Emilio Jorge Power
>
>Please visit;
>"The Liguus Home Page"
>http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Gold/9440/liguus/lighompa.html
>West Melbourne, Florida  USA
>