Well, I don't know.  Remember that Garner Ted Armstrong (from the
Worldwide
Church of God) put forth that really elegant proof against evolution
where he
showed a picture of a television camera and pointed out that we could
let it sit
for as long as we wanted and it would never evolve into a better
television
camera.  So why should we believe that the human eye, which is
infinitely more
complex than the television camera, could have evolved from a simpler
eye?
Pretty hard to deny that logic, huh?

Facetiously yours,
Casey

--
Casey Burns - Wind Instrument Maker and Occasional Paleontologist
9962 Shorty Campbell Road  Kingston WA 98346 USA
(360) 297-4020
[log in to unmask]
http://kendaco.telebyte.com
Instrument Catalog: http://kendaco.telebyte.com/cburns/flutecat.html
Care Instructions: http://kendaco.telebyte.com/cburns/care.html