CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Monfils, Paul" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Sep 1999 10:30:09 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
A couple of questions about family names:
I don't think ICZN rules apply to family names?  Is that right?  Yet family
names almost always seem to be derived from a genus name within the family.
Is this just sort of a tradition, or are there any rules or guidelines
governing it?  What about a family name like Potamididae?  As far as I know,
there is no genus name that is similar.  Where does such a name come from?
One last question - when it was decided to divide the Cymatiidae into two
families, why was Personidae chosen for the other family, given that Persona
is no longer a valid genus name?  Why wasn't it called Distorsiidae, after
Distorsio, the current and valid equivalent?
Paul M.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2