Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 7 Nov 2004 12:58:23 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello,
I find the Obis data basis a good tool because they give their
sources. In the case of the genus Cerithium you find:
Houbrick, R.S. 1992. p.4 General reference
Houbrick, R.S. 1992. p.16 Range map
I use OBIS as a basis and make modifications when I don't agree with
their choices. For example, for some Muricidae I would prefer Houart
to Tan.
There is still some little trouble with the technique: instead of the
title of an article you might have something like that :
{{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deftab720{\fonttbl{\f0\.... but with
the author and the date you generally find out what you are looking
for.
A great thing is that this tool is completely free !
Sophie
>How reliable is OBIS ( http://data.acnatsci.org/obis/ ) in its
>designation of species names as synonyms? Is there any reason I should
>not use its "Name In Current Use" as I update my database for my
>Cerithiidae? As usual, a simple Google search finds many sites listing
>or picturing shells under names that OBIS calls synonyms.
>--
>Cecil N. Bankston
>Baton Rouge, LA
>USA
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|