Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:23:32 -0600 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
================================================
MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L
================================================
Subject:
MAPS-L: Including maps in Google Scholar
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005
From: L-Soft list server at UGA (1.8d) <[log in to unmask]>
To: Angie Cope <[log in to unmask]>
Paige -
Interesting that you should write this as it is a topic of discussion in
some circles. As one who works in a small institution that Google has shown
some interest in (and I suspect they are reading this at the same time you
are?) I believe that maps offer only a small amount of difficulty as
compared to other formats. And, what would be an impressive starting point
would be to have Google "mine" various online databases so that they
include bib records in Google Scholar that are accompanied by high quality
raster images - how would that be for a start?
David
***************************************************************************
David A. Cobb Tel. 617.495.2417
Harvard Map Collection FAX 617.496.0440
Harvard College Library Email: [log in to unmask]
Cambridge, MA 02138 HTTP://hcl.harvard.edu/maps
************************** VERITAS ****************************************
At 01:46 PM 12/1/2005, you wrote:
>================================================
>MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L
>================================================
>
>
>
>
>Subject: RE: MAPS-L: Including maps in Google Scholar
>Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005
>From: Kadri, Carolyn J <[log in to unmask]>
>To: Maps, Air Photo & Geospatial Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
>
>Paige and everyone:
>
>We should pursue Google on this matter.
>
>Carolyn Kadri
>UT Arlington
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Maps, Air Photo & Geospatial Systems Forum
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Angie Cope, AGSL
>Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 9:05 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: MAPS-L: Including maps in Google Scholar
>
>================================================
>MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L
>================================================
>
>
>Subject: Including maps in Google Scholar
>Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005
>From: Paige Andrew <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>Good morning everyone, and please excuse the cross-posting. I promised
>someone I would raise this issue over a month ago so its about time I
>get
>this done! As of mid-October it was noted that Google Scholar does not
>include maps/cartographic material in its database, which for those of
>us
>who work with maps/cartographic materials should be a concern. Is it a
>big
>enough concern to make a concerted effort to push for inclusion by
>talking
>directly to Google folks? Here's a couple of direct quotes given to
>me...
>
>"...the fact that Google Schlolar appears to not include maps is
>problematic; not just for [us], but for all OCLC-cataloged map
>collections. ...interdisciplinary scholarship would benefit if Google
>also
>included WorldCat map collections in their Scholar project. I think that
>such an inclusion would be an important project for the map cataloging
>community to undertake -- convince Google to incorporate WorldCat map
>records in Scholar."
>
>and
>
>"Google needs some input from the map community that WorldCat map
>records
>should be mined and included."
>
>So, once again maps find themselves in a "stepchild" situation compared
>to
>other formats of material. How do folks feel about pursuing a change for
>this addition?
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Paige
>
>P.S. Should I broaden the audience and see if I can get this question
>posted to AUTOCAT?
>
>
>
>
>--
>
>
>
>--
|
|
|