Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 13 Mar 1996 21:48:39 EST |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Follow-up to a previous posting that I did.
Alberta
|=================================================================|
| Alberta Auringer Wood, Maps, Data and Media Librarian |
| Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, |
| CANADA A1B 3Y1. phone: 709-737-8892; fax: 709-737-2153; |
| Internet: [log in to unmask] |
|=================================================================|
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 17:12:12 GMT
From: m.wood <[log in to unmask]>
To: Multiple recipients of list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Design questionnaire <fwd>
Dear colleagues in cartography,
About wo weeks ago I sent out the following gentle 'reminder'/request for
help:
>Dear friends,
>
>Recently I and two colleagues sent out a questionnaire as part of our
>investigation into the practitioners' view of map design. We mailed
>over two hundred of these mainly to the UK but with a good
>representation to the US and Canada. The requested deadline was 15
>March of this year and, sadly, so far (and with only 2 weeks to go) we
>have received only 15 returns.
>
>I know how difficult it can be to answer such questionnaires (and we
>have tried to make most of the questions easy to answer) but I would
>like to put out a SPECIAL PLEA for you to try to complete and return
your
>copy. I have been asked to report on this project at the SoC Summer
>School in September and I would like to make that presentation as full
>as possible. To the people who have already responded we are very
>grateful. The information contained in these forms is very interesting
>but our results will be of considerably lower value of based on such a
>low response. I do appreciate that for some resaons you may find it
>difficult or impossible to respond to this request but please try, or
email
>me.
>
>ALSO!!! If there are any cartographers on this list who have NOT
>received a copy of the questionnaire and WOULD LIKE ONE, please
>reply to [log in to unmask] AND [log in to unmask]
>
>The more responses we get the better!
>
>Thank you for your patience,
I am glad to say that we now have nearly 30 responses but this is still
low for analysis. I would like to thank all those who have helped so far.
I realise that the stated deadline is all but gone but I am willing to
extend it to 22 March if I can encourage others to return their copy,
completed. We really do need the responses if we hope to derive any
representative impression.
Thank you again,
Mike
|
|
|