MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7BIT
Sender:
Maps and Air Photo Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"J. B. Post" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Jan 1997 09:59:55 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Maps and Air Photo Systems Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
   While watching different news programs last night, it was rather obvious
that different stations use different services for the weather maps used.  The
information is essentially the same, yet the "maps" themselves do vary in how
the information is presented.  Some are rather gimmicky in how they catch the
eye - the "fly-through" 3-D one is the most obvious.  Has any study been done
on the design of these graphics?  I ask, being somewhat out of the current
mapping field.  If not, is this an area for NACIS to address?  I haven't seen
one that I can't understand, but the "base maps" do vary in how an area is
depicted.  And does your average viewer even care, using the charisma of the
weather person as the criteria of which to choose to watch?
 
                         J. B. Post

ATOM RSS1 RSS2