----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Robin Haun-Mohamed at the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO) asked me
to post the following in response to the discussion of the Defense Mapping
Agency's world maps. I apologise for the delay in posting this. Part of
the question which I forwarded to her was why GPO had not cataloged these
world maps.
John Stevenson
University of Delaware Library
A. Receipt
1. "Series" 1150-World, scale 1:14,000,000 is scheduled to be sent, but
GPO has never received them. Possibly this is because some of the world
series maps <1106, 1107, etc.> were marked "not for distribution" by
DMA, and others were marked only for distribution by selected geographic
areas. For example, (1) Africa, (2) Antarctica... etc. In each case,
the 9th area was listed as "World." One would understand that a
selection of Area 9 would give you all the others.
2. In GPO's List of Classes... GPO lists D 5.355: Series 1105 through 5213
There "series" (actually single maps grouped by editions) list the "nos"
of those which have actually been received by GPO sporadically under
the project. GPO has not received the 1995 (or any) edition of the
"series." If GPO did, it would be most logical to place it under the
SuDocs classification D 5.355:1150...
B. Cataloging
As far as cataloging goes, the Library of Congress has expressed a
preference for cataloging sheets of maps that can stand alone (have
borders, their own scale, projection, coordinate information) as separate
maps. This was expressed to GPO in discussions of single counties in the
'County map series' which were divided into two or more separate sheets.
LC cataloged each sheet separately. GPO, however, cataloged them
together of they were received together or if it was at all feasible.
(see OCLC #32143172.) The value of the way LC does it is that there may
be a possibility that any of the sheets might be re-issued in an updated
edition separately. (If GPO received them separately with new edition
statements then GPO will also catalog them separately.) An exaggerated
example of this is the "Topographic quadrangles of the U.S." with each
7.5-minute sheet cataloged separately. In this case, LC did not follow
their usual policy. It is understandable that map people are confused
by the recent 1995 LC cataloging of the World (OCLC #34318956). The
maps are listed as "6 maps" but given one title and one group of
coordinates. The intent was probably to show that the six maps made up
a set. LC has suggested such a set with their record for Desert access
guide, OCLC # 19590576.
> ----------------------------Original message----------------------------
> I've received a 1995 set of 6 maps "THE WORLD" done by the Defense
> Mapping Agency. The OCLC record describes it as 1 map on 6 sheets and
> I'd like to make sure about the use of this phrase for this set of maps.
> I'm relatively new to map cataloging so I'm seeking information not
> questioning the cataloging!! My maps have white borders and could not
> be put together to form a whole without trimming or folding. But they
> do have a single title and a sheet index showing how they "fit" together.
> Is this 1 map on 6 sheets or 6 maps? Thanks for the help as always --L.
>
> Linda L. Smith (904) 646-2550 : SUNCOM 861-2550
> Cataloging Department FAX 904-646-2719
> University of North Florida Library P.O. Box 17605
> 4567 St. Johns Bluff Road, South Jacksonville, FL 32245-7605
> BITNET: LSMITH@UNF1VM :: INTERNET: [log in to unmask]
>
|