Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 5 Feb 2005 13:19:07 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: date of situation map cataloging]
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 01:05:45 GMT
From: Philip Hoehn <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
------------------
The cataloger needs to determine (or estimate) the real date of
situation and not use the date at which the publisher presumably plans
to issue a new edition. A map you have in hand now that says "Laufzeit
12/2007" is should have a date of something like [2004?] or [2005?] with
the "Laufzeit" in a note. Might be a good idea to include a note saying
"Publication date based on date of receipt."
Phil Hoehn, Map Librarian
San Francisco -- [log in to unmask]
-----------------------------------
Contractor for David Rumsey Collection:
http://www.davidrumsey.com
-- "Johnnie D. Sutherland" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: date of situation map cataloging
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:22:13 -0800
From: Terra Hangen <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
------------------
Hi colleagues.
I do the original cataloging of maps at UCSC, and have a question about
selecting the date to use in the map call number when the map says
"Laufzeit" and a year.
Today I am cataloging the map Mitteleuropa, autokarte, a Freytag, Berndt
und Artaria map. ISBN 3850842169 (brings up several records in OCLC).
On the map margin is "Laufzeit 12/2007".
I question using 2007 as the date in the map call number, but the note says
Laufzeit [good through] 2007. Ordinarily I would use the date, I guess I
hesitate since 2007 is 2 years ahead.
Typically I might receive a map in 2005 with the note "Laufzeit, good
through, 2005" on it, so there isn't a conflict in that situation.
Any input will be appreciated.
Terra Hangen
|
|
|