I agree Mr. Poppe's opinions. I think the second one is also a arabica. - Jiongtao http://www.soft.ics.keio.ac.jp/~huang/ >From: "Guido T. Poppe" <[log in to unmask]> >Reply-To: Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]> >To: [log in to unmask] >Subject: Re: ID help again >Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:29:55 +0200 > >The first one is Cypraea arabica, the second one is more difficult and I >have no idea. Location data is important for this one. > >Guido >‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹ >Visit Conchology, with over 50000 names with author, 3800 indicated type >species, 5000 conchological images, and fun with shells. > >http://www.conchology.uunethost.be/ >‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹ > > > From: Nancy Smith <[log in to unmask]> > > Reply-To: Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]> > > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 22:00:23 -0400 > > To: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: ID help again > > > > Hello folks, > > > > Please visit this link and send me your thoughts on the species IDs of > > these juveniles. I appreciate it very much. :) > > > > http://nansaidh.home.mindspring.com/ > > > > Best regards, > > Nancy > > ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com