That is what I would call Conus larglierti. (I hope I spelled that correctly) I pronounce it (lar-glee-heir-tie). I don't have my references with me since I am in the process of moving. I do remember the Compendium as having an error with its illustration of C. sennottorum. What I was calling C. sennotorum is more of a pear shaped shell with no blotches of color like C. larglierti. I remember seeing a C. larglierti with data indicating that it came from Yucutan. If you saw those posts about Conus sennotorum a couple of weeks ago then you should know "if" the holotype is the same species as the paratype, then C. sennotorum is a form of C. spurius or perhaps maybe a subspecies of C. spurius from Yucutan. Maybe it would be better if more shell books that are used for identification had photos of holotypes or at least reference the paper or the text where the photo and description of the holotype is. Andrew