----------------------------Original message---------------------------- I agree. We don't need another one. I do not plan to subscribe (little enough time to read MAPS-L) -- Phil Hoehn -- Univ. of California, Berkeley Library ([log in to unmask]) On Wed, 9 Mar 1994 [log in to unmask] wrote: > ----------------------------Original message---------------------------- > I can't see the rel evance of duplication another MAPxyz-list... MAPS-L > seems to be a good platform for discussion even the historical aspects > in cartography. > Of course, MAPS-L is "moderated" with a little "delay" in distribution. > I am curious to learn about "new members for the new listserv list". > > F. Hoffmann /DD 23:45