MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Angie Cope <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Maps, Air Photo & Geospatial Systems Forum
Date:
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:42:18 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        BLM Surface Mgmt. Series question
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:01:38 -0800
From:   Toni Whitley <[log in to unmask]>
To:     [log in to unmask]




Lately we have been receiving a Surface Mgmt Status topo map from BLM,
and also a second map that includes Surface Mgmt /and/ Minerals Mgmt.
It looks like an identical map with a mineral mapping overlay.

Are other libraries receiving both?  I'm wondering if it would be OK to
discard the surface mgmt. and keep only the Surface Mgmt/Mineral Mgmt copy?






Toni Whitley
Government Publications & Maps
SDSU Library
619-594-1658
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2