By the way, I applaud you adding the 500 note in Option 2, that may be helpful for a user to know but at least it will help other catalogers by seeing exactly what it says on the map when they are deciding on matching copy to use!
Paige
________________________________
From: Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc. <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Nancy Kandoian <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 10:36 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Cataloging question for scale with decimal point
I'd also use option 2, because with option 1, the unusual look might be confusing to users; they might wonder if there was a typo involved.
Nancy
--
Nancy A. Kandoian
Librarian
Lionel Pincus and Princess Firyal Map Division
The New York Public Library
Stephen A. Schwarzman Building
476 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10018
212.930.0586 | x20586
nypl.org<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnypl.org&data=02%7C01%7Cpga2%40psu.edu%7C61501a4cbc3e42d889c708d6e8fe9334%7C7cf48d453ddb4389a9c1c115526eb52e%7C0%7C1%7C636952577423241660&sdata=5FIIgzUPZVtSFc0p%2B6nJ4WVwr5HhZHPDgICo%2Fe43JWo%3D&reserved=0>
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 10:05 AM Andrew, Paige G. <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
I'd use Option 2 myself. In such cases I round up or down, thankfully it is rare.
Paige
________________________________
From: Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc. <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on behalf of Angela R Cope <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 9:40 AM
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Cataloging question for scale with decimal point
I have a map that includes the scale as a representative fraction and with a decimal(see attached photo) as 1/41436,6. This is an 1891 Russian government nautical chart.
I calculated the scale and the 414,363 is approximately correct.
The MARC record will not allow me to list the scale in the 034 as 414363.6.
Possible options as I see it:
Option 1
034 414363
255 Scale 1:414,363.6
Option 2
034 414364
255 Scale approximately 1:414,364.
500 "Masshtabʺ 1/414363,6 ... ."
How would you catalogers handle this?
Thanks.
Angie
|