-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: Nauru and the G schedule?
Date:   Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:35:57 -0500
From:   Paige Andrew <[log in to unmask]>
To:     [log in to unmask]
References:     <[log in to unmask]>



Toby,

Are you referring to the /printed/ G-schedule? I ask because it is in
Classification Web as G9490 just as you indicated. I also went to the LC
Authority Files and indeed it is still a valid placename heading. So if
folks are classifying a map of Nauru using the LC Classification System
indeed it should be under this number.

If this concerns the latest edition of the printed G-Schedule then my
guess is that somebody made an error and it dropped out accidentally.

Paige

At 02:01 PM 2/24/2009, you wrote:
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:        Nauru?
> Date:   Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:40:34 -0500
> From:   Toby Main <[log in to unmask]>
> To:     [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> Anybody know why Nauru has dropped out of the G schedule? The old CIA
> map from 1988 is classed at 9490, but the number does not appear in my
> 2005 edition. As near as I can tell from the State Department web site
> Nauru is still a going (if teeny-tiny) concern. Has there been some
> cosmic realignment I missed?
>
> TM
>
> Toby Main
> State Library of New Mexico
> 1209 Camino Carlos Rey
> Santa Fe, NM 87507
>
>
> --
> Be Yourself @ mail.com!
> Choose From 200+ Email Addresses
> Get a *Free* Account at www.mail.com <http://www.mail.com/> <
> http://www.mail.com/Product.aspx>!