MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Quill, Theresa Marguerite" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.
Date:
Thu, 2 Feb 2017 17:51:01 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (5 kB) , text/html (17 kB)
I just tweeted to both of the sponsoring Congressmen asking why this clause is there. I’ll share if they decide to reply!



-Theresa



Theresa Quill

Social Sciences Librarian (GIS/Maps)

Indiana University Bloomington

[log in to unmask]



From: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>" on behalf of "[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>"

Reply-To: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>"

Date: Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 12:33 PM

To: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>"

Subject: GIS and mapping - S.103 and H.482 - Local Zoning Decisions Protection Act of 2017







________________________________

From: Angela R Cope <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>

Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 11:31 AM

To: maps-l

Subject: Fw: S.103 and H.482 - Local Zoning Decisions Protection Act of 2017





Read the emails below ...





" In other words, this bill would in essence prohibit the  use of Federal funds to create maps showing community racial disparities or disparities in access to affordable  housing. "



Forwarded by Angie











From: Ratliff, Louise [mailto:[log in to unmask]]

Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 11:12 AM

To:

Cc: l

Subject: RE: S.103 - Local Zoning Decisions Protection Act of 2017







By the way, there are TWO such bills, one in the House and one in the Senate:



https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/482





https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/103







Of particular note is section 3 (of both bills):

-------------------------

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS.  Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be used to design, build, maintain, utilize, or provide access to a Federal database of geospatial information on community racial disparities or disparities in access to affordable housing.







--Louise







From: Hallie Pritchett [mailto:[log in to unmask]]

Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 9:05 AM

To:

Cc:

Subject: Re: S.103 - Local Zoning Decisions Protection Act of 2017







This was posted on GOVDOC-L as well, although the person who posted was more concerned about archive government websites that may go missing.  Here's the response I sent to GOVDOC-L this morning:







---







The larger and far more troubling issue is the what Section 3 is actually prohibiting:



Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be used  to design, build, maintain, utilize, or provide access to a Federal  database of geospatial information on community racial disparities or  disparities in access to affordable housing.



Geospatial information is data referenced to geographic coordinates;  such data that can be mapped and analyzed using a Geographic Information  System (GIS).  In other words, this bill would in essence prohibit the  use of Federal funds to create maps showing community racial disparities or disparities in access to affordable  housing.  Housing is obviously location-based; it is much easier for  most people to understand and interpret such data when it is displayed  on a map.  Prohibiting the use of Federal funds to create what has long been a standard data visualization tool for  understanding and interpreting often complex data, particularly for the  type data in question and given the fact that most members of Congress  or the American public are not experts in understanding and interpreting numeric data is nothing short of outrageous.  This  appears to be a blatant attempt to limit if not eliminate transparency  in HUD; that alone is absolutely chilling.







---







I haven't had a chance to look at the history of these bills, which might give some clue as to why this clause was included.  My guess is that some Congressional staffer who worked the bill knows something about GIS and the power of maps to show such data clearly.  Regardless, this really needs more attention than it's currently getting.







Hallie Pritchett

Head, Map and Government Information Library

Map and Federal Regional Depository Librarian

University of Georgia Libraries

Athens, GA 30602

[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

706-542-0664

Map and Government Information Library -

www.libs.uga.edu/magil<http://www.libs.uga.edu/magil>



________________________________













From: Gamm, Margaret H [mailto:[log in to unmask]]

Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 4:28 PM

To:

Cc:

Subject: S.103 - Local Zoning Decisions Protection Act of 2017







Hello all,







This came to my attention today. You may be aware of it already, so my apologies for duplication if you are. The broad wording of this bill is deeply concerning as it could affect the availability of some resources.







https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/103/text







Specifically, Section 3:



SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS.



Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be used to design, build, maintain, utilize, or provide access to a Federal database of geospatial information on community racial disparities or disparities in access to affordable housing.







-Margaret











Margaret Gamm



Special Collections Librarian



University of Iowa Libraries



[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>



(319) 335-6247










ATOM RSS1 RSS2