MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Angie Cope, American Geographical Society Library, UW Milwaukee" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship
Date:
Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:33:36 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4089 bytes) , text/html (30 kB)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        RE: theoretical map classification?
Date:   Fri, 7 Feb 2014 18:10:42 +0000
From:   Naomi Behmer <[log in to unmask]>
To:     Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship
<[log in to unmask]>



Thanks for the advice.  It’s good to get confirmation from the experts.

Naomi

*From:*Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Angie Cope, American
Geographical Society Library, UW Milwaukee
*Sent:* Friday, February 07, 2014 8:17 AM
*To:* [log in to unmask]
*Subject:* Re: theoretical map classification?

------- Original Message --------

*Subject: *



Re: theoretical map classification?

*Date: *



Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:28:51 -0500 (EST)

*From: *



Paige G. Andrew <[log in to unmask]> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>

*To: *



Air Photo Maps, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship <[log in to unmask]>
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Naomi,

�

I am also looking at the 1976 (4th ed.) and 2007 editions of the
G-schedule and the note that appears with the class number G9900 is what
Louise has shared. There is no reference to going to the subject code
table. There is no need to -- the class number of 9900 /means/ that what
is being classed is a theoretical map or maps, and therefore it is not
necessary to apply a subject code to the class number. It also means
that one does not change the 4th digit to a "1" -- which is what one
does when turning to the G1 table to apply a subject code from that
table. The subject is inherent in the class number. In my opinion,
whomever created bib. records for similar maps that you found in OCLC
mis-applied the classification number and you should use G9900.

Paige

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*From: *"Angie Cope, American Geographical Society Library, UW
Milwaukee" <[log in to unmask]> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
*To: *[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
*Sent: *Friday, February 7, 2014 7:29:36 AM
*Subject: *Re: theoretical map classification?

-------- Original Message --------

*Subject:*



RE: theoretical map classification?

*Date:*



Thu, 6 Feb 2014 23:33:37 +0000

*From:*



Ratliff, Louise <[log in to unmask]>
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

*To:*



'Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship'
<[log in to unmask]> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Hi Naomi,

I�looked in Classification Web under G9900 and here is what it says:

G9900��Theoretical maps.

���������������“Class here maps whose primary intent is the illustration
or definition of terms and concepts and maps designed to illustrate
methods of map making. Class maps of a determinable geographic area with
the area.”

It does not reference a table of any kind.

Sorry I can’t be of further help L

Louise

Louise Ratliff

Social Sciences and Map Catalog Librarian

UCLA Library Cataloging & Metadata Center

11020 Kinross Ave.

Box 957230

Los Angeles, CA 90095-7230

(310)206-5853

*From:*Maps, Air Photo, GIS Forum - Map Librarianship
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Angie Cope, American
Geographical Society Library, UW Milwaukee
*Sent:* Thursday, February 06, 2014 2:05 PM
*To:* [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
*Subject:* theoretical map classification?

-------- Original Message --------

*Subject: *



theoretical map classification?

*Date: *



Thu, 6 Feb 2014 21:08:08 +0000

*From: *



Naomi Behmer <[log in to unmask]> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>

*To: *



[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
<[log in to unmask]> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>

I am cataloging several theoretical maps, with no specific geographic
location. At the end of the G schedule is G9900-G9980 for ‘Unlocalized
maps’ with G9900 for ‘Theoretical maps’. By looking at similar type
records in OCLC it looks like Table G1 has been applied leading to
classification G9901 followed by a subject number. This appears logical
and useful but using online Classification Web I cannot see the
instruction to use a table. Please can someone advise on current practice?

Thanks for any help

Naomi

*Naomi Behmer*
Cataloging Lecturer

University Libraries

Texas A&M University
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>

�

Library Annex | 5000 TAMU | College Station, TX 77843

�

Tel. 979.458.0807 | Fax. 979.862.1166

�

http://library.tamu.edu/

�

�

�

�

�





ATOM RSS1 RSS2