MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Rees, Gethin" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.
Date:
Mon, 17 Sep 2018 11:33:40 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (6 kB) , text/html (32 kB)


Dear Sonoe,



We are currently in the process of revising our GIS cataloguing guidelines. At present we are looking at using the 300 field to primarily identify a GIS dataset.



  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">

            <subfield code="a">1 geospatial database</subfield>

   </datafield>

or

  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">

            <subfield code="a">1 online resource (1 map)</subfield>

   </datafield>



The 336 and 655 fields are also pertinent:



  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">

            <subfield code="a">Cartographic dataset</subfield>

   </datafield>



   <datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7">

            <subfield code="a">Digital maps</subfield>

    </datafield>

or

    <datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7">

            <subfield code="a">Topographic maps</subfield>

    </datafield>

or

    <datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7">

            <subfield code="a">Outline maps</subfield>

    </datafield>



To describe a GIS dataset we are also using fields like:



    <datafield tag="352" ind1=" " ind2=" ">

        <subfield code="a">Vector</subfield>

    </datafield>

or

    <datafield tag="352" ind1=" " ind2=" ">

        <subfield code="a">Raster</subfield>

    </datafield>



I hope this is still useful despite a long delay in replying.

Any feedback would be gratefully received.



Best,



Gethin





Dr Gethin Rees

Lead Curator, Digital Mapping

British Library

+44 (0)2074127218







------------------------------



Date:    Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:28:54 +0000

From:    Jorge DaCosta <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: Question about GIS Dataset Cataloging



Hi





Not sure how much cataloging experience you have or if you use OCLC for your MARC records.  I'm a Library Technician and do mostly copy cataloging.  I don't catalog GIS datasets but I've taken a couple of GIS classes.  I've done some research on cataloging them just for personal interest.





You can find dataset MARC records in OCLC/WorldCat and see what they do as an example.





Jorge DaCosta

Santa Rosa, CA

[log in to unmask]





________________________________

From: Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc. <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Sonoe Nakasone <[log in to unmask]>

Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 10:11 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Question about GIS Dataset Cataloging



Dear Maps-L,



I hope this reaches you -- not sure if I can post without being a list member.



Does anyone know of best practices for MARC encoding for GIS datasets?  In our new catalog currently in development, we plan to use fixed fields to generate "resource type" facets.  One such facet, we hope, will be for GIS datasets.  Our problem so far is we can't seem to identify MARC codings that can be used to reliably identify GIS datasets in our catalog for this purpose.



The MARC codings aren't our only option for identifying these, but we'd prefer to use these codings where possible.  I'd appreciate any thoughts, advice, suggestions, or resource recommendations for this.  Thank you!



Sonoe

-------------

My pronouns are She, her, and hers



------------------------------



Date:    Thu, 30 Aug 2018 09:07:56 -0700

From:    Tom Brittnacher <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: Question about GIS Dataset Cataloging



Hi Sonoe:

We do lots of MARC cataloging of GIS datasets here.  We haven't been able to use any of the fixed fields to identify GIS data specifically, seeing as most values end up being 'not applicable' or 'other', or related to cartographic aspects of the material.  We use genre (655 field) to differentiate geospatial data, as well as the 347 and 352 fields (though those two don't display in our OPAC and are not searchable).  I'd be happy to send you our guidelines if you're interested.

Best,

Tom





On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 8:39 AM Jorge DaCosta <[log in to unmask]>

wrote:



> Hi

>

>

> Not sure how much cataloging experience you have or if you use OCLC

> for your MARC records.  I'm a Library Technician and do mostly copy

> cataloging.  I don't catalog GIS datasets but I've taken a couple of

> GIS classes.  I've done some research on cataloging them just for

> personal interest.

>

>

> You can find dataset MARC records in OCLC/WorldCat and see what they

> do as an example.

>

>

> Jorge DaCosta

> Santa Rosa, CA

> [log in to unmask]

>

>

> ------------------------------

> *From:* Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc. <[log in to unmask]> on

> behalf of Sonoe Nakasone <[log in to unmask]>

> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2018 10:11 AM

> *To:* [log in to unmask]

> *Subject:* Question about GIS Dataset Cataloging

>

> Dear Maps-L,

>

> I hope this reaches you -- not sure if I can post without being a list

> member.

>

> Does anyone know of best practices for MARC encoding for GIS datasets?

> In our new catalog currently in development, we plan to use fixed

> fields to generate "resource type" facets.  One such facet, we hope,

> will be for GIS datasets.  Our problem so far is we can't seem to

> identify MARC codings that can be used to reliably identify GIS

> datasets in our catalog for this purpose.

>

> The MARC codings aren't our only option for identifying these, but

> we'd prefer to use these codings where possible.  I'd appreciate any

> thoughts, advice, suggestions, or resource recommendations for this.  Thank you!

>

> Sonoe

> -------------

> My pronouns are She, her, and hers

>

>



--

Tom Brittnacher

Geospatial Data Curator

GISP



UCSB Library

University of California

Santa Barbara, CA  93106-9010

(805)893-2366

[log in to unmask]



------------------------------



End of MAPS-L Digest - 29 Aug 2018 to 30 Aug 2018 (#2018-164)

*************************************************************







******************************************************************************************************************

Experience the British Library online at www.bl.uk<http://www.bl.uk/>

The British Library’s latest Annual Report and Accounts : www.bl.uk/aboutus/annrep/index.html<http://www.bl.uk/aboutus/annrep/index.html>

Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book. www.bl.uk/adoptabook<http://www.bl.uk/adoptabook>

The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled

*****************************************************************************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent.

The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the author.

*****************************************************************************************************************

Think before you print


ATOM RSS1 RSS2