MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"Maps, Air Photo & Geospatial Systems Forum" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Angie Cope, AGSL" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:24:31 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"Maps, Air Photo & Geospatial Systems Forum" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
================================================
MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L ** MAPS-L
================================================


Subject: General Material Descriptor (GMD)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005
From: Miriam Glanz <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]

Our University is getting ready to do full-scale cataloging records and
the cataloging department fired the question below off to me that I
thought I would pass on to the list for comment. Any comments and or
insight would be appreciated!



Why would a library make the decision to NOT use a GMD (general material
descriptor) for maps?  It seems to me it would be helpful to patrons to
see "cartographic material" just as they do "electronic resource" or
"microform" (et al.) when confronted by a long list of titles. Yet the
GMD is optional, and LC has opted NOT to add it to any cartographic
material.  I can understand not wanting to use it on atlases (many of
which I don't think should be cataloged as maps at all), because they're
very book-like.  Sheet maps, though, seem to be a different animal
altogether and I think should have the GMD added.



Miriam Glanz

Arizona State University Library Map Collection





--

ATOM RSS1 RSS2