I'm not sure this is relevant to the actual cataloging, but my thought
vis-a-vis Joel's comment is that this rubbing *is* a one-of-a-kind if you
consider that every other rubbing of the same stone would be a little
different, no? ;)
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Jon Jablonski <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I love you all.
>
> I want to say that the stone is the original and the rubbing is a
> reproduction. But then I think: we don’t consider woodcuts to be
> reproductions of the wood blocks.
>
> What would Mary do?
>
> Jon Jablonski
> Director, Interdisciplinary Research Collaboratory
> Spatial Data Librarian, Map & Imagery Lab
> UCSB Library
> 805-893-4049 <(805)%20893-4049>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 21, 2017, at 5:50 AM, Angela R Cope <[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>>
> wrote:
>
> Exactly. And to add to the difficulty, I don't really know when my rubbing
> was made. So, can I copy catalog on LC's record? My map has many
> similarities in terms of marks but a few unique elements that ... make me
> think it was done at a different time than that held at LC. Yale has one
> too. It's the Yi ji tu and one other (I actually have two of them I'm
> trying to figure out).
>
> https://www.loc.gov/item/gm71005080/
>
>
> Angie
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc. <[log in to unmask]
> <[log in to unmask]>> on behalf of Joel Kovarsky <
> [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>>
> *Sent:* Friday, July 21, 2017 6:26 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> *Subject:* Re: [MAPS-L] Cataloging help - manuscript reproduction?
>
> Angie,
>
> I cannot speak for how the catalogers will see this, but might it be hard
> to assert that it is one of a kind?
>
> The process is not so unusual: https://www.loc.gov/maps/?dates=1100-1199
> and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_rubbing .
> <https://www.loc.gov/maps/?dates=1100-1199>
> Search results from Map, 1100 to 1199 - Library of Congress
> <https://www.loc.gov/maps/?dates=1100-1199>
> www.loc.gov
> Yu ji tu. 禹迹图. Stone rubbing dated 1903? One of the earliest stone maps,
> it consists of 5,110 grids, each grid is ...
>
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_rubbing>
> Stone rubbing - Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_rubbing>
> en.wikipedia.org
> Stone rubbing is the practice of creating an image of surface features of
> a stone on paper. The image records features such as natural textures,
> inscribed patterns or ...
>
>
> Joel
>
> On 7/21/17 7:19 AM, Angela R Cope wrote:
>
> Hi have a map that is a rubbing from a stone. So, it's a one of a kind,
> hand done rubbing but a reproduction of a map on stone.
>
> So is it a manuscript or is the rubbing method simply the printing process?
>
> Help.
>
> Angie
>
>
>
--
Michael Fry
Collections Manager | Map Library Manager
National Geographic Society Library
202.807.3139
[log in to unmask]
[image: Nat Geo Logo Yellow_Black.png] <http://www.nationalgeographic.org>
1145 17th St., NW, Washington, DC 20036
[image: Email-Signature8.gif] <https://donate.nationalgeographic.org/em-sig>
|
