MAPS-L Archives

Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc.

MAPS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"Maps, Air Photo & Geospatial Systems Forum" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Maps-L Moderator for Silvana <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:11:39 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Question regarding practice in describing hand-col maps
Date:   Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:08:25 -0700
From:   [log in to unmask]
To:     MAPS-L <[log in to unmask]>



Hello,
As a new cataloger of mostly pre-20th cent. cartographic materials I am
trying to
figure out where exactly to include the term "hand-col." for maps that
are issued
hand-col (wash and/or outline). Also how to use the term in describing
maps hand-col. after
issue. Including "hand-col." in 300b and using col. in 300b w/500 detail
note both seem to be
valid options. So, I'd just like to know if one practice is prescribed
or preferred over the other
and what current applications might be.

Any thoughts would be most appreciated.
-Silvana

ATOM RSS1 RSS2