But since 246 is for "varying form of title," wouldn't a 7xx (either 740,
or a 700 or 710 with a subfield t, and then a second indicator 2) be more
appropriate for an analytic (like a map within a book)?  I think of
"varying form of title" as another or variant title of the main work being
cataloged, like a panel title versus a title on the face of a map, or a
spine title versus a title-page title of a book.

Nancy

++++++++++++++

Nancy A. Kandoian
Map Cataloger
The Lionel Pincus and Princess Firyal Map Division, Room 117
Stephen A. Schwarzman Building
The New York Public Library
5th Avenue and 42nd Street
New York, New York 10018
(212) 930 0586

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Bertuca, David <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> I have used the 246 inclusion to resolve this as the maps are distinct
> enough that I want to provide access (a lot of geology reports come to
> mind). It was one way that was acceptable here at UB where cataloging
> policy was determined to not provide exceptions or to separate items form
> their parent record.
>
>
>
> David J. Bertuca, Map Librarian
>
> Science and Engineering Information Center
>
> 116 Lockwood Memorial Library
>
> University at Buffalo
>
> Buffalo, NY 14260-2200
>
> 716-645-1332 <(716)%20645-1332> / 716-645-3859 <(716)%20645-3859> (fax)
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> Liaison to the Geography Department for GIS and Physical Geography
>
>
>
> *From:* Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On
> Behalf Of *Ken Rockwell
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 12, 2017 9:47 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: cataloguing question
>
>
>
> Hi, Ifigenia,
>
>
>
> Something I do In cases where the maps are the accompanying material, but
> have separate titles and might be of interest by themselves, is to enter a
> 246 for the map title, preceded by a note, thus:  $i Title of accompanying
> map: $a [title]
>
>
>
> --Ken Rockwell
>
> University of Utah
>
>
>
> *From:* Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc. [mailto:[log in to unmask]
> <[log in to unmask]>] *On Behalf Of *?F?G????? ??????OS??
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 12, 2017 2:24 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* cataloguing question
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear all, Happy New Year!
>
>
>
> A question for the cataloguing process:
>
> I have a book which has two separate maps in it. Each one has its own
> title and scale e.t.c.
>
> Should we catalogue each map separately?  And use 770 (? Or what else?) to
> link it with the book?
>
> Or should we follow the simple “+ 2 maps in folder” (there are records in
> that form).
>
>
>
> I believe this is a policy choice but I would like to hear your opinion
> and how you manage a case like this.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> Ifigenia Vardakosta
>
> Harokopio University
>
> Library & Information Centre
>
> El.Venizelou 70
>
> 176-71 Kallithea,Athens
>
> Greece
>
> tel:+30-2109549170 <+30-2109549170>
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>