CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: TOWNSEND COLLECTION
From:
Greg Curry Sr <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Feb 2024 15:45:02 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2888 bytes) , text/html (10 kB) 
 Hi All Just wanted to Thank everybody for all this great help I rec'd....
Mr. Paul if ok I will email you directly ..
But before I go I have a question that has confused me for a long time.. Being an amateur I don't understand why a shell that has papers and a holotype and paratypes is not accept in Worms or other databases ?
Best Regards
Greg
     On Friday, February 16, 2024 at 10:14:35 AM EST, Callomon,Paul <[log in to unmask]> wrote:  
 
 #yiv9472946345 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}The Academy has two paratypes ofAurinia kieneri ethelae, including ANSP 196801, the one figured in the original description as pl. 2, figs. 3, 3a

Paul Callomon
Collection Manager, Malacology and General Invertebrates

Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, Philadelphia
[log in to unmask] Tel 215-405-5096 - Fax 215-299-1170




 

From: Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of David Berschauer <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2024 10:00 AM
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [CONCH-L] TOWNSEND COLLECTION 
| 
External.
 |

My understanding is that it is at the ANSP


Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 16, 2024, at 9:50 AM, Alan Kabat <[log in to unmask]> wrote:



Follow-up -- for what it is worth, since Pilsbry was a co-author of this new species, I suspect that the ANSP should at least have the radula slide! 

On Thursday, February 15, 2024 at 07:16:36 PM EST, Alan Kabat <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


Here's the original description -- it was a subspecies:
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/8514633
Subsequent illustration of the radula, also referencing the Townsend collection:
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/10576549
Somewhat surprising that the holotype is elusive, given the popularity of this family.
--Alan Kabat


On Thursday, February 15, 2024 at 04:19:04 PM EST, Greg Curry Sr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:



[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscsTo leave this list, click on the following web link:http://listserv.uga.edu/scripts/wa-UGA.exe?SUBED1=conch-l-L&A=1Type your email address and name in the appropriate box andclick leave the list.----------------------------------------------------------------------  

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/scripts/wa-UGA.exe?SUBED1=conch-l-L&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2