Thanks for this advice. I did find an additional AMS guidebook on symbology:

https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015014628070&seq=5

And on the first page, there are two charts that show the levels of
importance for place names. The first chart is for places in the US, and
the levels are divided by population thresholds. The second chart has place
names for foreign areas - there are no thresholds, but there is a footnote
that says "Where feasible, populated places will be classified according to
available population data." So ultimately, I'm hoping to find documentation
on these levels from the French army mapping agency, Service Geographique
de L'Arme.

Best - Frank



On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 2:31 PM McEathron, Scott R <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Frank,
>
>
>
> I believe this stems from attempts to create the International map of the
> World 1:1,000,000.  The article below discusses the difficulty of having an
> international convention for “importance” of populated places—you may be
> able track what each of the contributing nations ended up using for their
> categories.
>
>
>
> “Carte Internationale Du Monde Au Millionème.” The Geographical Journal
> 43, no. 2 (1914): 178–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/1778923.
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
>
>
> Scott R. McEathron, M.A., M.L.I.S.
>
> Librarian
>
> Head, Center for Graduate Initiatives & Engagement
>
> KU Libraries
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Maps-L: Map Librarians, etc. <[log in to unmask]> *On Behalf
> Of *Donnelly, Frank
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 31, 2024 10:56 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* AMS Maps - Depiction of Settlements by Level of Importance
>
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
>
>
> I'm working with some researchers who are looking at US Army Map Service
> (AMS) maps of Africa, specifically in Chad. At the bottom of the map in the
> Reference section there is a key that lists "Towns of Importance" with
> rankings 1st through 4th and their symbols. Here is an example, AMS Fort
> Lamy Chad 1942:
>
>
>
>
> https://maps.lib.utexas.edu/maps/ams/africa_1m/txu-pclmaps-oclc-6587819-nd-33.jpg
>
>
>
> The researchers want to know if there was a *specific* convention for
> establishing the level of importance, such as population thresholds. If
> not, then generally what convention was used. I found a guidebook on
> Geographical Names for Military Maps the AMS published in 1945:
>
>
>
> https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uiug.30112104121618&seq=1
>
>
>
> But it makes no mention of these conventions. These maps from Chad were
> copied and translated from the French Army mapping service, Service
> Geographique de L'Armee, so perhaps it's their convention. Searching the
> web, HathiTrust, and JSTOR for terms in French, I couldn't find anything
> useful except for this: LES ECRITURES SUR LES CARTES TOPOGRAPHIQUES
> ("ENTRIES ON TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS") 1934, which seems promising. But it's not
> available digitally and very few libraries own copies. I found some for
> sale, including this one on eBay that has some pages scanned (but none that
> give me the info I need):
>
>
>
> https://www.ebay.fr/itm/266327757645
>
>
>
> My question! Does anyone have a reference to a source that identifies how
> these importance levels for towns and settlements were established?
>
>
>
> Thanks and best - Frank
>
>
> --
>
> Frank Donnelly (he/him/his)
>
> Head of GIS & Data Services | Brown University Library
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
> https://libguides.brown.edu/geodata | https://atcoordinates.info/
>
>
>
> [log in to unmask] (group email for social science librarians)
>


-- 

Frank Donnelly (he/him/his)
Head of GIS & Data Services | Brown University Library
[log in to unmask]
https://libguides.brown.edu/geodata | https://atcoordinates.info/

[log in to unmask] (group email for social science librarians)